I can’t remember if I linked to Mark Levine’s Q&A about the Supreme Court decision in Gore v. Bush, but I had problems with the earlier versions due to some errors of fact that I noticed. Apparently thousands of other people did, too, and let the author know about it. Anyway, here’s the updated version. Absent any consideration of the ultimate result of the Supreme Court’s decision, I think that the reasoning they used to render it was tortured and out of keeping with the law. I think that Levine’s essay raises some valid points, but I also think it’s a bit too severe — I don’t believe that the Supreme Court Justices are as nefarious as he portrays them to be.