rc3.org

Strong opinions, weakly held

Month: April 2003 (page 8 of 10)

Dan Gillmor’s book on blogging

While I can’t express any particular excitement about the idea of Dan Gillmor writing a book about the intersection of blogging and journalism (personally, I’d rather read a plumbing manual), I do want to comment on his plan for working collaboratively with the community to insure that his book is accurate: dude needs a Wiki. There. I’ve always wanted to say that.

Sanctions

It occurs to me that for all the talk of the general ineffectiveness of sanctions and inspections in the run up to Gulf War II (or, as I like to think of it, Gulf War I Continued), we can look back at containment and say with confidence that it was successful in keeping Iraq weak and hapless. We can all be thankful that there was no cataclysmic armor battle on the outskirts of battle between the Republican Guard and our forces, and our bombing notwithstanding, we can thank containment for that. Back in 1991, the Iraqi army was dealt a vicious defeat at the hands of the Americans — unfortunately not enough of one enable the people of Iraq to overthrow him in the aftermath of the war, but enough to render the Iraqi military impotent as an offensive fighting force. Since then, an extreme effort has been made to prevent Iraq from reconstituting its military. Thus, when we started this war, Iraq had no air power at all and more importantly, they basically had only those armored vehicles that have survived since Gulf War I.

At this point, I still wouldn’t rule out use of chemical weapons, but if they are employed, it will be in a terrorist fashion rather than as a tactical weapon used as part of a battle. During the Iraq/Iran war in the eighties, chemical weapons were used often and effectively as a counter to Iran’s “human wave” attacks by the Iraqi army. Yeah, they gassed their own troops sometimes, but they apparently were pretty good at using chemical weapons to kill Iranians for their own advantage on the battlefield. We’ve seen none of that whatsoever. It probably wouldn’t have worked anyway, because the US has the equipment and training to avoid taking casualties to those sorts of attacks, but the point is that Iraq hasn’t even tried it. I think you have to put that down to containment as well, at least partly.

There’s no question that containment was, in many ways, a failure. Certainly Saddam Hussein let the deprivation of revenue due to sanctions trickle down to the people of Iraq in the most brutal way possible, and we continued to be left without a sensible exit strategy outside of war. But our ability to dominate Iraq in the ground war, while certainly advantageous in terms of avoiding loss of life, also casts doubt on whether war was necessary in the first place. The battle plans were drawn under the assumption that Iraq was impotent, and it turns out that from a strategic standpoint, that’s true. Small bands of partisans with guns and RPGs have been flies in the ointment who have killed some US soldiers and have contributed to the deaths of many Iraqi civilians, but as the Pentagon has often pointed out, they haven’t affected the larger battle plan. So maybe containment wasn’t so ineffective after all.

When Garret speaks, people listen

Check out Garret’s addendum to Paul Krugman’s latest column.

Tiles 101/201

The Server Side has published a Tiles 101/201, a small guide to the Tiles extension for Struts. Tiles is a pretty elegant solution for a very thorny problem in Web programming — handling cases where you want to modify multiple records using a single form.

More on the rockage of .NET

Perhaps my admiration of .NET is just one of those greener grass things. At least that’s the impression I get from Yole’s latest post on Syndirella development.

Comments on SharpReader

I have to say, the ultimate form of laziness is posing musings to your weblog that are really questions in disguise. For example, I’m about to type up some “comments” on SharpReader that are, in fact, desperate pleas for help, either from the author (who can add features that will placate me), or users of SharpReader, who can tell me how to do the things that I’m trying to accomplish. This is also a form of arrogance, since it’s assumed that the author of SharpReader will somehow see these comments and respond. Of course, SharpReader has been out for less than a week, so I’m not expecting miracles. In any case, I could have started this entry with the next paragraph, but I didn’t, in the interests of brutal honesty and full disclosure.

I started using SharpReader yesterday, since my man Yole has said he’s throwing in the towel on Syndirella. There are a few issues that I’m struggling with:

  • The whole paradigm of deleting items and marking them read is slightly confusing to me. Since you’re not really deleting the items, it seems odd to “delete” them from within SharpReader. I guess it provides a convenient way to get rid of things you don’t want to look at any more and keep interesting items. I just have to get used to it. I’m not sure whether items that were deleted show back up if they’re updated on the site.
  • There doesn’t seem to be an easy way to get rid of a bunch of items at once. I’m probably just missing it.
  • I can’t get links to open consistently in Mozilla. This is a deal breaker if I can’t figure out a way around it. (Luke commented on this yesterday.)
  • It seems the only way to delete the item you’re currently reading is to have focus on the item listing pane rather than on the item detail pane. So if you have a long item that you need to scroll, to go back and delete that item you have to click in the item listing first. Also, the tab key shifts focus from the listing pane to the detail pane, but when the focus is on the detail pane, it won’t move focus back to the listing pane.

Accident or “accident”

The US managed to bomb the offices of both Al Jazeera and Abu Dhabi TV yesterday in Baghdad, and then denied that they were purposeful. We also bombed the Al Jazeera office in Kabul in Afghanistan during the bombing there as well. I’m not sure whether I believe the Pentagon on this or not.

Life is nothing without humor

Slate’s Timothy Noah collected some PR tips for Iraqi Minister of Information Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf.

What do you know?

I saw a link to this story on the Agonist controversy at Dangerousmeta, and lo and behold, there’s a quote from me at the end! It’s cribbed from this site — the actual writer of the story never contacted me, and misspelled my name to boot. Criticize The Agonist, get free media exposure. Who knew? In any case, I stand by what I said. I really found the whole episode to be a great disappointment.

By the way, the item that the quote was taken from is here, if you’re interested in context.

Update: there’s one thing from the article that I do want to comment on. The writer of the article says that Sean-Paul falsely attributed items cut and pasted from Stratfor to unnamed sources in order to encourage other potential sources to send items to him. That disappoints me more than anything else I’ve read so far. I can understand how one might fall into the trap of trying to manufacture insider status and turn that into a larger audience of readers, but as far as I’m concerned, it’s just unfathomably dishonest. I was very shocked and disappointed to read that.

Does .NET rock?

Yole says he’s going to dump Syndirella because there’s another RSS reader that does things he was planning on doing. I’m going to download it and try it out myself.

The larger point, though, is that .NET must really, really rock as a development environment. Just in the area of RSS newsreaders, we’ve seen several implemented in .NET that are very impressive, have a relatively small footprint, and seem to have been written very rapidly. I’m not one to heap praise upon Microsoft, but the proof is in the pudding. People are writing really nice software using .NET as a platform with seemingly little effort, and I’m taking notice.

Older posts Newer posts

© 2025 rc3.org

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑