<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP tip of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2008/03/03/php-tip-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2008/03/03/php-tip-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2008/03/03/php-tip-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/2008/03/03/php-tip-of-the-day/#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m definitely an always use the {} with &quot;if&quot; type person.  However, I think that it may make sense to use this because leaving it out produces a very easy to detect bug (your page probably doesn&#039;t compile), whereas putting it in can sometimes produce a more difficult bug to track down.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely an always use the {} with &#8220;if&#8221; type person.  However, I think that it may make sense to use this because leaving it out produces a very easy to detect bug (your page probably doesn&#8217;t compile), whereas putting it in can sometimes produce a more difficult bug to track down.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Trachtenberg</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2008/03/03/php-tip-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2453</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Trachtenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/2008/03/03/php-tip-of-the-day/#comment-2453</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I used to recommend this, but that specific justification is less of a problem now that we have the output_buffering configuration option. (Assuming you don&#039;t disable this.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s only really a worry now when you&#039;re developing code, such as the Drupal team, where you don&#039;t control the deployment environment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now I think it&#039;s better to keep the closing ?&gt; for all the same reasons it&#039;s good to keep {} with if() statements, assuming you buy into those types of arguments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to recommend this, but that specific justification is less of a problem now that we have the output_buffering configuration option. (Assuming you don&#8217;t disable this.)</p>

<p>That&#8217;s only really a worry now when you&#8217;re developing code, such as the Drupal team, where you don&#8217;t control the deployment environment.</p>

<p>Now I think it&#8217;s better to keep the closing ?&gt; for all the same reasons it&#8217;s good to keep {} with if() statements, assuming you buy into those types of arguments.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

