<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the media really works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2008/05/28/how-the-media-really-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2008/05/28/how-the-media-really-works/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Barrett</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2008/05/28/how-the-media-really-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=8245#comment-2688</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is why &quot;tabloid journalism&quot; or &quot;sensationalistic journalism&quot; is ruining the quality of mainstream media.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sure, the masses are demanding it because it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;more interesting&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;more exciting&lt;/em&gt; but by focusing on the glitz and ignoring the story behind the glitz/hype we end up with a media industry that caters to those in power, recycling talking points, selling us an unnecessary war, inane conversations about a flag lapel pin and the personal beliefs of a unbalanced pastor, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sure, it sells more papers and generates more clicks, but the long-term harm it does to a nation and a culture is inexcusable. Just look at the mess that the past 7 years has been. Would we be in such a mess had the media been responsible and focused on the details and done their job educating the public instead of climbing all over themselves trying to out-do each other to be the next Drudge Report or Rupert Murdoch-style sensationalistic trash-loid.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why &#8220;tabloid journalism&#8221; or &#8220;sensationalistic journalism&#8221; is ruining the quality of mainstream media.</p>

<p>Sure, the masses are demanding it because it&#8217;s <em>more interesting</em> or <em>more exciting</em> but by focusing on the glitz and ignoring the story behind the glitz/hype we end up with a media industry that caters to those in power, recycling talking points, selling us an unnecessary war, inane conversations about a flag lapel pin and the personal beliefs of a unbalanced pastor, etc.</p>

<p>Sure, it sells more papers and generates more clicks, but the long-term harm it does to a nation and a culture is inexcusable. Just look at the mess that the past 7 years has been. Would we be in such a mess had the media been responsible and focused on the details and done their job educating the public instead of climbing all over themselves trying to out-do each other to be the next Drudge Report or Rupert Murdoch-style sensationalistic trash-loid.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Taylor</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2008/05/28/how-the-media-really-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=8245#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The way to build traffic on the Web is to get links from other websites. The way to get links is to be first with news — sometimes big news, sometimes small — that drives that day’s conversation.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess they didn&#039;t consult any bloggers who have widely read blogs. Seems to me that bloggers get readers through, oh, I don&#039;t know, original and compelling content. And those are readers who return.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess that&#039;s the difference between wanting &#039;traffic&#039; and links and wanting readers and people to hold a discussion with.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pathetic.</p>

<p><em>The way to build traffic on the Web is to get links from other websites. The way to get links is to be first with news — sometimes big news, sometimes small — that drives that day’s conversation.</em></p>

<p>I guess they didn&#8217;t consult any bloggers who have widely read blogs. Seems to me that bloggers get readers through, oh, I don&#8217;t know, original and compelling content. And those are readers who return.</p>

<p>I guess that&#8217;s the difference between wanting &#8216;traffic&#8217; and links and wanting readers and people to hold a discussion with.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogers Cadenhead</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2008/05/28/how-the-media-really-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogers Cadenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=8245#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for putting into words what I didn’t like about that mea culpa. I also found it off-putting that he’s telling the world not to care about a story that was obviously of strong interest to many people. When it went live Friday on the Drudge Retort, we had 80 comments in two hours, and that was before I saw it had been posted by a user and promoted the story to the front page.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting into words what I didn’t like about that mea culpa. I also found it off-putting that he’s telling the world not to care about a story that was obviously of strong interest to many people. When it went live Friday on the Drudge Retort, we had 80 comments in two hours, and that was before I saw it had been posted by a user and promoted the story to the front page.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://profile.typekey.com/rcade/</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2008/05/28/how-the-media-really-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>http://profile.typekey.com/rcade/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=8245#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for putting into words what I didn&#039;t like about that mea culpa. I also found it off-putting that he&#039;s telling the world not to care about a story that was obviously of strong interest to many people. When it went live Friday on the Drudge Retort, we had 80 comments in two hours, and that was before I saw it had been posted by a user and promoted the story to the front page.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting into words what I didn&#8217;t like about that mea culpa. I also found it off-putting that he&#8217;s telling the world not to care about a story that was obviously of strong interest to many people. When it went live Friday on the Drudge Retort, we had 80 comments in two hours, and that was before I saw it had been posted by a user and promoted the story to the front page.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
