<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discussion: is Obama too close to Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2009/01/16/discussion-is-obama-too-close-to-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2009/01/16/discussion-is-obama-too-close-to-google/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Adams</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2009/01/16/discussion-is-obama-too-close-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-4297</link>
		<dc:creator>David Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=8912#comment-4297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Based on what I read about the &quot;negotiations&quot;, it was more about ensuring that YouTube&#039;s terms of use were compatible with official government sharing and towards more open access to the content, ie the downloadable format.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sure that feature has been on Google&#039;s list for a while, but it appears maybe that the Obama administration gave them the final push. It&#039;s also worth noting that the transition team has posted their videos on multiple streaming sites (the latest is on YouTube, Vimeo, and MySpace--I&#039;d seen some on Yahoo and MSN, not sure if that&#039;s still going on).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re right that it&#039;s critical that Google be pressured to stay as open as possible, but it seems like Obama&#039;s team is doing the right thing here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the anti-trust question, while it does seem crazy that Google has such a big share of search (though fully deserved in you ask me), in the realm of stickier services like calendaring, webmail, IM, etc, they really aren&#039;t one of the big players.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on what I read about the &#8220;negotiations&#8221;, it was more about ensuring that YouTube&#8217;s terms of use were compatible with official government sharing and towards more open access to the content, ie the downloadable format.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m sure that feature has been on Google&#8217;s list for a while, but it appears maybe that the Obama administration gave them the final push. It&#8217;s also worth noting that the transition team has posted their videos on multiple streaming sites (the latest is on YouTube, Vimeo, and MySpace&#8211;I&#8217;d seen some on Yahoo and MSN, not sure if that&#8217;s still going on).</p>

<p>You&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s critical that Google be pressured to stay as open as possible, but it seems like Obama&#8217;s team is doing the right thing here.</p>

<p>On the anti-trust question, while it does seem crazy that Google has such a big share of search (though fully deserved in you ask me), in the realm of stickier services like calendaring, webmail, IM, etc, they really aren&#8217;t one of the big players.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

