<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The trouble with giving advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2009/03/02/the-trouble-with-giving-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2009/03/02/the-trouble-with-giving-advice/</link>
	<description>Rafe Colburn on software development (and other topics)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tok</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2009/03/02/the-trouble-with-giving-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-4830</link>
		<dc:creator>tok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=9214#comment-4830</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s hard to have an absolute rule about advice.  There are times when you do generally have a mastery of a system, and your advice is valid, but there are other times/spheres in which mastery is simply not possible, and your advice is simply unlikely to compensate for all the factors that you&#039;re incapable of knowing.  In general, this is true of economics.  In stable times, the way in which your knowledge correlates with the &quot;general consensus&quot; may make you appear to be a savant, but in times of flux, one would be very lucky to have one&#039;s basic assumptions about an inhumanely complex system actually match the reality of such a system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One must know their limits.  In economics and finance, at least amongst the most vocal in those fields, this is a rare trait.  Of course this is so for a reason.  Risk and reward (for the advisors) are quite asymmetrical.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to have an absolute rule about advice.  There are times when you do generally have a mastery of a system, and your advice is valid, but there are other times/spheres in which mastery is simply not possible, and your advice is simply unlikely to compensate for all the factors that you&#8217;re incapable of knowing.  In general, this is true of economics.  In stable times, the way in which your knowledge correlates with the &#8220;general consensus&#8221; may make you appear to be a savant, but in times of flux, one would be very lucky to have one&#8217;s basic assumptions about an inhumanely complex system actually match the reality of such a system.</p>

<p>One must know their limits.  In economics and finance, at least amongst the most vocal in those fields, this is a rare trait.  Of course this is so for a reason.  Risk and reward (for the advisors) are quite asymmetrical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe K</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2009/03/02/the-trouble-with-giving-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-4826</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=9214#comment-4826</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;...advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

