<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who funds small state Senators?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2009/08/03/who-fund-small-state-senators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2009/08/03/who-fund-small-state-senators/</link>
	<description>Rafe Colburn on software development (and other topics)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2009/08/03/who-fund-small-state-senators/comment-page-1/#comment-6271</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=9817#comment-6271</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Imagine what the Congress would look like if no &#039;critter were allowed to have a conflict of interest between contributions and committees:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;No &#039;critter could accept campaign contributions from any company, industry, or industry PAC/group regulated by his or her committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;No &#039;critter or his/her immediate family could invest in any company or industry regulated by or directly affected by the &#039;critter&#039;s committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &#039;critter would be barred from working in/for any of the aforementioned for ___ years after leaving congress, either as an employee, business owner or consultant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Violators to be punished by fines &lt;em&gt;AND&lt;/em&gt; prison.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not perfect, of course, but at least the foxes would have to dress up better and cluck more convincingly while guarding the henhouse.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine what the Congress would look like if no &#8216;critter were allowed to have a conflict of interest between contributions and committees:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>No &#8216;critter could accept campaign contributions from any company, industry, or industry PAC/group regulated by his or her committee.</p></li>
<li><p>No &#8216;critter or his/her immediate family could invest in any company or industry regulated by or directly affected by the &#8216;critter&#8217;s committee.</p></li>
<li><p>The &#8216;critter would be barred from working in/for any of the aforementioned for ___ years after leaving congress, either as an employee, business owner or consultant.</p></li>
<li><p>Violators to be punished by fines <em>AND</em> prison.</p></li>
</ul>

<p>Not perfect, of course, but at least the foxes would have to dress up better and cluck more convincingly while guarding the henhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jannie Funster</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2009/08/03/who-fund-small-state-senators/comment-page-1/#comment-6269</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannie Funster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=9817#comment-6269</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have NO earthly idea, but it seems a lot of graft does go on, sadly.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have NO earthly idea, but it seems a lot of graft does go on, sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

