<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anil Dash on Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2009/08/07/anil-dash-on-google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2009/08/07/anil-dash-on-google-wave/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medley</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2009/08/07/anil-dash-on-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-6288</link>
		<dc:creator>Medley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=9847#comment-6288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. Total catnip. But my lingering reaction is that it may be, paradoxically, too good to really work/catch on. There are plenty of examples of superior products or tools that never caught on for various reasons. On the other hand, as some of the commenters in Anil&#039;s post mentioned, it&#039;s Google - they may be able to be persuasive. We&#039;ll see.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Total catnip. But my lingering reaction is that it may be, paradoxically, too good to really work/catch on. There are plenty of examples of superior products or tools that never caught on for various reasons. On the other hand, as some of the commenters in Anil&#8217;s post mentioned, it&#8217;s Google &#8211; they may be able to be persuasive. We&#8217;ll see.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

