<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where we are in Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2009/10/25/where-we-are-in-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2009/10/25/where-we-are-in-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medley</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2009/10/25/where-we-are-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-6953</link>
		<dc:creator>Medley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=10215#comment-6953</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was thinking about this on the Metro this morning - reading some typically sub-par coverage of the Afghanistan issue and the question that popped into my head was: &quot;WHAT IS THE POLICY OBJECTIVE?&quot; -- absent a clear articulation of that, it is impossible to judge the merits of any particular strategy. I thought that I should probably dig into this report (which I&#039;d also seen a link to over at Digby&#039;s with some add&#039;l commentary by her - http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/we-have-watches-they-have-time-by-digby.html) and some other things - I mean, maybe there is a clearly-articulated policy objective but the media is just too stupid to explain it, but I just don&#039;t know if I have the stomach.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about this on the Metro this morning &#8211; reading some typically sub-par coverage of the Afghanistan issue and the question that popped into my head was: &#8220;WHAT IS THE POLICY OBJECTIVE?&#8221; &#8212; absent a clear articulation of that, it is impossible to judge the merits of any particular strategy. I thought that I should probably dig into this report (which I&#8217;d also seen a link to over at Digby&#8217;s with some add&#8217;l commentary by her &#8211; <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/we-have-watches-they-have-time-by-digby.html" rel="nofollow">http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/we-have-watches-they-have-time-by-digby.html</a>) and some other things &#8211; I mean, maybe there is a clearly-articulated policy objective but the media is just too stupid to explain it, but I just don&#8217;t know if I have the stomach.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

