<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The philosophical argument against Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2010/01/25/the-philosophical-argument-against-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2010/01/25/the-philosophical-argument-against-flash/</link>
	<description>Rafe Colburn on software development (and other topics)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dowdell</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2010/01/25/the-philosophical-argument-against-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-7815</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dowdell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=10683#comment-7815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rafe, what do you think?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(When I first read Gruber that passage seemed to say &quot;whether the world buys in doesn&#039;t matter; the decision-making process must be by (manipulable) consortium&quot;... he didn&#039;t seem to ask, he seemed to be telling. By similar logic, he should shun iPhone and Macintosh. But that was only one passage in a lengthy sermon, so I didn&#039;t pursue.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting with a real name, Cameron! Yes, Macs have performance problems, particularly with anything in a browser. Adobe Corp prefers not to emphasize these, in hopes of getting better cooperation in fixing the problems from Apple Corp. Next generation of smartphones has a lot more cooperation for Flash optimization... you could always supplement your Mac with an Android or Palm or whatever.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;jd/adobe&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafe, what do you think?</p>

<p>(When I first read Gruber that passage seemed to say &#8220;whether the world buys in doesn&#8217;t matter; the decision-making process must be by (manipulable) consortium&#8221;&#8230; he didn&#8217;t seem to ask, he seemed to be telling. By similar logic, he should shun iPhone and Macintosh. But that was only one passage in a lengthy sermon, so I didn&#8217;t pursue.)</p>

<p>Thanks for posting with a real name, Cameron! Yes, Macs have performance problems, particularly with anything in a browser. Adobe Corp prefers not to emphasize these, in hopes of getting better cooperation in fixing the problems from Apple Corp. Next generation of smartphones has a lot more cooperation for Flash optimization&#8230; you could always supplement your Mac with an Android or Palm or whatever.</p>

<p>jd/adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Barrett</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2010/01/25/the-philosophical-argument-against-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-7811</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=10683#comment-7811</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Flash is painfully slow on Macs. Adobe would like to point the finger at Apple, but the truth is Apple&#039;s hardware is more than fast enough to do video playback. The issue is Flash, pure and simple.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apple&#039;s high level of quality control basically forced them to tell Adobe to go take a hike because Flash for video playback simply is not up to the standards they need.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is not Apple&#039;s fault; it is Adobe&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Adobe is going to miss out on a HUGE market that we&#039;re all going to find out about tomorrow with Apple&#039;s tablet announcement.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash is painfully slow on Macs. Adobe would like to point the finger at Apple, but the truth is Apple&#8217;s hardware is more than fast enough to do video playback. The issue is Flash, pure and simple.</p>

<p>Apple&#8217;s high level of quality control basically forced them to tell Adobe to go take a hike because Flash for video playback simply is not up to the standards they need.</p>

<p>This is not Apple&#8217;s fault; it is Adobe&#8217;s.</p>

<p>Adobe is going to miss out on a HUGE market that we&#8217;re all going to find out about tomorrow with Apple&#8217;s tablet announcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beige</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2010/01/25/the-philosophical-argument-against-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-7806</link>
		<dc:creator>Beige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=10683#comment-7806</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Worse, Flash is really really really slow.  Sure, video is fine on that dual-core real computer, but a netbook with an Atom that can play video via some other software (mplayer, for example) just fine is at the very limits to maybe, maybe not, play low-res youtube via flash.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worse, Flash is really really really slow.  Sure, video is fine on that dual-core real computer, but a netbook with an Atom that can play video via some other software (mplayer, for example) just fine is at the very limits to maybe, maybe not, play low-res youtube via flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

