<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pricing content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2010/02/03/pricing-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2010/02/03/pricing-content/</link>
	<description>Rafe Colburn on software development (and other topics)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2010/02/03/pricing-content/comment-page-1/#comment-7909</link>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=10738#comment-7909</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is the huge dilemma facing libraries at the moment. We loosely define our patron/funding base in terms of geopolitical regions [towns where I live, but states and nations too] and our information easily crosses those boundaries. We pay our vendors according to those outlines and yet we can easily email or fax or postal-mail a document to anywhere in the world.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of the databases that I use regularly -- one the state of Vermont pays for so that all VT libraries can use -- now has MP3s of many of their articles available for download. I, of course, downloaded audio copies of all the articles I&#039;d written. I&#039;d love to put them online. I&#039;m fairly certain I can&#039;t... but not totally sure why.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Generally speaking all librarians use this &quot;back-channel ILL&quot; feature and share content with each other, but it&#039;s trickier providing our patrons with access to this wealth of content. But making arbitrary divisions of who gets it and who doesn&#039;t get it just seems ... arbitrary. And vendors are scared but haven&#039;t come up with a more decent and rational pricing scheme encouraging [to me] more end running in order to solve problems. Tricky times. Glad you liked the post.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the huge dilemma facing libraries at the moment. We loosely define our patron/funding base in terms of geopolitical regions [towns where I live, but states and nations too] and our information easily crosses those boundaries. We pay our vendors according to those outlines and yet we can easily email or fax or postal-mail a document to anywhere in the world.</p>

<p>One of the databases that I use regularly &#8212; one the state of Vermont pays for so that all VT libraries can use &#8212; now has MP3s of many of their articles available for download. I, of course, downloaded audio copies of all the articles I&#8217;d written. I&#8217;d love to put them online. I&#8217;m fairly certain I can&#8217;t&#8230; but not totally sure why.</p>

<p>Generally speaking all librarians use this &#8220;back-channel ILL&#8221; feature and share content with each other, but it&#8217;s trickier providing our patrons with access to this wealth of content. But making arbitrary divisions of who gets it and who doesn&#8217;t get it just seems &#8230; arbitrary. And vendors are scared but haven&#8217;t come up with a more decent and rational pricing scheme encouraging [to me] more end running in order to solve problems. Tricky times. Glad you liked the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

