<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is the government is blocking access to oily beaches?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rc3.org/2010/07/05/why-is-the-government-is-blocking-access-to-oily-beaches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rc3.org/2010/07/05/why-is-the-government-is-blocking-access-to-oily-beaches/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: acm</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2010/07/05/why-is-the-government-is-blocking-access-to-oily-beaches/comment-page-1/#comment-9164</link>
		<dc:creator>acm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=11235#comment-9164</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and yet, nobody keeps swimmers and other tourists from swimming in the oily muck itself!  amazing thought processes...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and yet, nobody keeps swimmers and other tourists from swimming in the oily muck itself!  amazing thought processes&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://rc3.org/2010/07/05/why-is-the-government-is-blocking-access-to-oily-beaches/comment-page-1/#comment-9161</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rc3.org/?p=11235#comment-9161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not to defend BP here, but I think parts of this story are being overblown or misrepresented. Having a 65 foot &quot;safety zone&quot; around operating vessels and other marine equipment seems entirely reasonable. That being said, I don&#039;t know why this would apply to beach or marsh access.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to defend BP here, but I think parts of this story are being overblown or misrepresented. Having a 65 foot &#8220;safety zone&#8221; around operating vessels and other marine equipment seems entirely reasonable. That being said, I don&#8217;t know why this would apply to beach or marsh access.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

