Bush sees that the growing pace and destructiveness of attacks in Iraq as proof that anti-occupation insurgents are becoming increasingly desperate. Once again, all evidence is taken as proof that whatever we’re already doing is working. What would prove that our efforts are not effective? Fewer attacks?
Interesting logic
Bush sees that the growing pace and destructiveness of attacks in Iraq as proof that anti-occupation insurgents are becoming increasingly desperate. Once again, all evidence is taken as proof that whatever we’re already doing is working. What would prove that our efforts are not effective? Fewer attacks?
Commentary
Previous post
The bottom lineNext post
The bizarre collision of technology and politics