Throughout my life, everyone I’ve admired (conservative and liberal alike) has held Brown v Board of Education as one of the truly good things the government has ever accomplished. Today the Supreme Court threw it on the ground and stomped the hell out of it, ostensibly in service of upholding its intent. Not a happy day for me.
June 28, 2007 at 5:15 pm
Well, dude, it’s kind of a rock and a hard place. If you cannot discriminate based on race, then you cannot discriminate on race. Regardless of whether the current political climate says it would be a good thing in the long run or not.
The alternatives are to say that it’s fine to discriminate based on race (which is a course fraught with peril), or to say that it’s okay to discriminate based on race sometimes. Expecting our legislature to craft an unambiguous, clearly interpreted Constitutional amendment to that effect is, I think, overly optimistic.
June 28, 2007 at 7:10 pm
There is no need for a constitutional amendment making certain kinds of notice paid to race by the government constitutional, as they’re not unconstitional now (or haven’t been held to be by decades of precedent).
I quote from Breyer’s dissent (well worth reading, especially for the history): http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=05-908#dissent2
Further:
The idea that the government must be “colorblind” is not one supported by precedent. Intent matters. Certainly the government is not required to be colorblind even when doing so would leave them unable to address the great inequality of school segregation. There’s no “gotcha!” clause that says you can’t pay attention to race in remedying racial inequality, and in fact that would be: stupid.
Unfortunately just that kind of stupid is what the majority went for in this case; the kind that says that you can wish away racial inequality at the stroke of a pen.
June 28, 2007 at 7:37 pm
Thanks, Jacob. As Breyer points out, all people are guaranteed equal protection under the law by the Constitution. It never says that race cannot play a factor in government decisions.
June 29, 2007 at 1:25 am
As Jacob has noted elsewhere, Stevens hits a home run with his dissent: