rc3.org

Strong opinions, weakly held

The “fat” iPod Nano

I had the same reaction I’ve seen from many people online to the first pictures I saw of the iPod Nano. It looked like a “fat” Nano, because its aspect ratio is so different from its predecessor’s. Then I saw the Nanos in the Apple Store today and realized they should be called the miniscule Nano. The new Nano is absurdly small and thin. Even more than the iPhone, it feels like it arrived from the future. Given the size of the Nano, I don’t really see there being a market for the iPod Shuffle any more.

3 Comments

  1. The Nano doesn’t have a clip. Love the clip.

  2. I was thinking the same thing as I wrote that. The shuffle’s form factor is incredibly useful for the “gym” application.

  3. Yep – needs the clip!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

© 2016 rc3.org

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑