What is liberalism about, in the most basic sense? Matthew Yglesias explains liberalism by way of an argument about a specific case regarding special needs children. I’d grab a juicy pull quote but you should read the whole thing.
What is liberalism about, in the most basic sense? Matthew Yglesias explains liberalism by way of an argument about a specific case regarding special needs children. I’d grab a juicy pull quote but you should read the whole thing.
Salon provides a list of the biggest blunders of the pundit class in 2008. I’m proud to say that I didn’t go for any of them. In fact, the day McCain selected Palin I told people it would go down as the worst political decision he ever made. Wish I’d blogged it.
Rogers Cadenhead on an Obama rally he attended in Orlando:
Throughout the event, black families, some with aging grandparents and young children, gently moved through attendees to get closer. Although the crowd was racially and generationally diverse, you couldn’t miss the emotion of blacks who had come to see Obama’s first event in the city. As an adopted Floridian who has learned the tragic history of race relations in the Sunshine State during my decade here, I had to marvel at the progress that brought some of the older Americans in attendance past central Florida’s Rosewood massacre, Klan lynchings, poll taxes and the civil rights struggle to this amazing moment in time.
Kind of made me think I should take a personal day and go out and see Obama if he comes back to North Carolina before the election.
Trying to recover from her disastrous appearance on Hardball Friday, Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann has written an op-ed for Politico denying that she said what she did. Politico helpfully embeds video of her comments so that readers can compare her denials with her statements.
She also calls out all of the outraged people who donated to her opponent:
In a matter of 48 hours after I participated in an interview with Chris Matthews on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” more than $640,000 from donors across the country flooded into my opponent’s campaign. Almost to a one, these are people who never would have considered voting for me if they lived in Minnesota. In fact, most of them have probably never voted for a Republican. These are strong supporters of Barack Obama who want to see more liberal policies enacted in Washington.
These are not people who know anything about my policy views. They don’t know anything about my record of reaching across the aisle on issues ranging from support for small business to foster care improvements, an issue near and dear to my heart as a former foster mother to 23 troubled teens. Or about my record of standing up to my own party when the occasion calls for it — such as opposing the $700 billion Wall Street bailout — and standing up to members of the other party when they try to push through tax hikes or limit personal liberty.
For the record, I knew she was the stupidest person in Congress long before her unfortunate bout of oversharing on Friday afternoon. After all, she’s the person who claimed to have been kidnapped by lesbians after a campaign event.
The New Yorker ran a long article this week explaining how John McCain came to choose Sarah Palin as his running mate, but it wasn’t very interesting. That said, FiveThirtyEight flags the most interesting bit, which is that the “draft Sarah Palin” movement arose from one Republican’s search on Wikipedia for a sufficiently conservative female politician.
Michele Bachmann, a first term Congresswoman from Minnesota, is perhaps the stupidest person in the United States House of Representatives (and that’s saying a lot). I already knew she was an idiot, but the performance she turned in on Hardball today confirms that she really has no business serving in government. (Hilzoy has the details.)
I donated $25 to her opponent, Elwyn Tinklenberg, and I’d recommend others do so as well.
The chat window is embedded below. Here’s a popup link if you prefer it.
New York magazine has an interview with Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com, this year’s go-to polling analysis site.
I’ve been reading Nate’s baseball analysis for years and was thrilled to see that he was applying his analytic approach to political polling this year. The results have not been disappointing. This paragraph describes my general reaction when I found out who was running fivethirtyeight.com:
Silver’s site now gets about 600,000 visits daily. And as more and more people started wondering who he was, in May, Silver decided to unmask himself. To most people, the fact that Poblano turned out to be a guy named Nate Silver meant nothing. But to anyone who follows baseball seriously, this was like finding out that a guy anonymously running a high-fashion Website turned out to be Howard Cosell. At his day job, Silver works for Baseball Prospectus, a loosely organized think tank that, in the last ten years, has revolutionized the interpretation of baseball stats. Furthermore, Silver himself invented a system called PECOTA, an algorithm for predicting future performance by baseball players and teams. (It stands for “player empirical comparison and optimization test algorithm,” but is named, with a wink, after the mediocre Kansas City Royals infielder Bill Pecota.) Baseball Prospectus has a reputation in sports-media circles for being unfailingly rigorous, occasionally arrogant, and almost always correct.
There are two things that I find interesting about this. The first is that I’ve been reading quantitative analysis of sports for years and wondering how the lessons drawn from that analysis can be applied to other fields. Silver’s work is illustrating just how applicable those lessons are, and I wasn’t surprised to read that he is being invited to speak before business audiences on his work.
The second is that it shows yet again how the secret to being a successful blogger is producing excellent content. Anyone who’s thinking about starting a blog should look at the success Silver has had. He started the year with a diary on the Daily Kos and now he runs a political blog that gets millions of views. Do great things, and the audience will be there.
The lesson for long-time bloggers with small (but wonderful) audiences is self-evident, sadly.
Glenn Greenwald documents the cozy relationship between Republican hatchet man Tim Griffin and the Politico’s Jonathan Martin. I post this link not because it’s exceptional but because, I suspect, it is typical.
© 2024 rc3.org
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑
The New York Times endorses Willkie
In 1940, the New York Times endorsed Republican Wendell Willkie after having endorsed Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 and 1936. They went back to endorsing Roosevelt in 1944, when he won his fourth term.
Why Willkie? From the endorsement:
Roosevelt went on to win 449 electoral votes to Willkie’s 82. (He won by 10 points in the popular vote.)